Skip to content
Volunteer Security Team
Pros
- Congregation members know the regular attendees — they will notice someone who does not belong.
- Higher investment in outcomes — volunteers are protecting their own community.
- Lower cost — most volunteers serve without pay.
- More scalable for large events — you can activate more volunteers than you can afford to contract.
Cons
- Training quality varies widely — many church volunteer teams receive little to no formal instruction.
- Turnover is unpredictable — volunteers move, change schedules, or disengage, often at the last minute. Team Leader is critical.
- Legal and liability exposure if a volunteer acts outside their authority.
- Volunteers may hesitate to act against a known congregation member.
- Managing “I was a cop” or “I was military” bravado can complicate team dynamics.
- Some states may require licensing even for church volunteer security roles.
- If the church is a “no firearm zone” but allowed volunteers to carry, that can be a major liability problem.
Also Consider
- What is your volunteer team’s actual training level and schedule? Being willing and being trained are not the same.
- Establish a minimum training requirement — and enforce it. A team with standards outperforms a team without them.
- Consider liability coverage: does your church insurance cover volunteers acting in a security capacity?
- Who does the final campus check — lockup, alarm set, building and grounds — at the end of each night, even if that’s 1:00 am?
Supplier's Security Guard(s)
Pros
- Trained and licensed professionals — background checked, certified, insured, and legally authorized.
- Reduces liability exposure for the church in certain incident scenarios.
- Does not require the church to build and sustain a training program. (But you still should.)
- Provides a credible visible deterrent, especially for high-profile events.
Cons
- Supplier’s guards do not know your congregation — they cannot distinguish a regular from an unknown.
- May not share your faith or values.
- Higher cost — meaningful outsourced coverage at every service adds up quickly.
- Quality varies by supplier — low-bid contracts often deliver minimal actual capability.
- A supplier’s guard’s primary accountability is to their employer, not your congregation.
Also Consider
- If you use a supplier, visit them. Meet the account manager. Ask what training their guards actually receive.
- Require a site orientation for every supplier guard before they stand post at your church.
- Define exactly what authority the supplier guard has — and put it in the contract.
- Who does the final campus check at the end of each night?
Hybrid: Volunteers + Contractor
Pros
- Covers both the relational knowledge of the congregation and the professional credibility of licensed security.
- Supplier guards can anchor the perimeter while volunteers work the interior. (See our Post Prioritization resource at security checklists )
- Scales well for high-attendance events without abandoning the volunteer program.
- Easier to put defined limits on volunteers where a supplier fills the gap.
Cons
- More complex to coordinate — requires clear role definition between volunteers, supplier, staff, and leadership.
- Highest cost option.
- Requires a security point of contact on staff or in volunteer leadership to manage the relationship.
- Training both teams together can be complicated.
Also Consider
- Define the chain of command clearly: who is in charge during an incident — the volunteer lead or the supplier guard?
- Brief both teams together before every service or event they share.
- Review supplier performance quarterly — do not assume consistency because a contract exists.
- Who does the final campus check at the end of each night?
Scroll to top