Armed — Concealed Carry
Pros
- Maintains element of surprise — a threat actor cannot identify and target your armed team member first.
- Reduces cultural friction in congregations sensitive to visible firearms.
- Team members can observe and respond without being avoided or accommodated by a threat actor.
- Flexible — can be disclosed to leadership while remaining covert to the general public.
- Last-resort capability to stop an active threat when law enforcement cannot respond in time.
Cons
- Requires discipline and ongoing training — an accidental incident undermines the posture entirely.
- Requires appropriate concealment gear and regular weapon retention training.
- If activated during an incident, arriving law enforcement cannot distinguish your carrier from the threat — requires a pre-arranged identification plan.
- May require state licensing beyond a personal CCW in most jurisdictions — verify before assuming.
- Significant insurance implications — review your policy before arming anyone.
Also Consider
- How do your concealed carriers identify each other during an incident — especially to arriving law enforcement? Have a written plan. Brief local law enforcement on your program before you need them.
- Establish a minimum training and qualification standard — and require annual re-qualification. Document it in writing.
- Who on your leadership team is accountable if a concealed carrier uses force? Answer that question now, in writing, before an incident occurs.
- Before arming anyone: consult your attorney, review your insurance policy, and establish a written use-of-force policy.
Armed — Open Carry
Pros
- Strong visible deterrent — communicates armed presence to everyone in the room.
- Attendees know exactly who to approach in an emergency.
- Easier for law enforcement and first responders to identify your team during an incident.
- Sets a clear organizational tone that security is taken seriously.
- Last-resort capability to stop an active threat with equal force.
Cons
- Creates a visible target — a bad actor can identify, avoid, or eliminate your armed team member first.
- Can alarm visitors or congregation members not expecting visible firearms in a worship setting.
- Higher cultural resistance in mainline, liturgical, or family-focused environments.
- Same licensing requirements as concealed — an open carrier without proper credentials creates significant liability.
- Legal liability for wrongful discharge or use of force is the organization’s, not just the individual’s.
Also Consider
- Does the visual of a firearm match the tone you are trying to set? A tactical vest at Christmas Eve communicates something very different than a polo with a holster.
- Brief your congregation in advance if you transition to open carry — surprises undermine trust.
- Coordinate with local law enforcement so they know your team’s appearance and positioning before an incident occurs.
- Consider a mix: open carry at entry points for deterrence, concealed carry in the sanctuary for flexibility.
Unarmed
Pros
- No firearm liability — eliminates accidental discharge, wrongful use, and weapon retention risk.
- Accessible in every state and jurisdiction without licensing complexity.
- Larger volunteer or staff pool — no firearms licensing required.
- Appropriate for the vast majority of organizations in stable, low-threat environments.
- Lower insurance premiums in most frameworks — confirm with your carrier.
Cons
- No capability to stop a lethal threat with equal force.
- Team members are limited to de-escalation, evacuation, and calling 911.
- Not a meaningful deterrent to a determined attacker with a weapon.
- May not be sufficient for very large events, high-profile speakers, or elevated-threat environments.
Also Consider
- Document the threat assessment that led to the decision to remain unarmed — and revisit it annually or after any incident.
- An unarmed team can still be highly effective: trained in de-escalation, emergency communication, evacuation routes, and trauma first aid.
- Consider whether unarmed is appropriate for all events — or whether specific high-risk events warrant a different temporary posture.
- Have you evaluated off-duty law enforcement as an option for high-risk events? (See Guards vs. LEO)
Related Resources