COST AND SIZE OF A GIG

A 50-year, non-scientific retail history of what it costs to store one gigabyte of data.

(Timeline: 1977 · 1982 · 1996 · 2010 · 2026)


Background, History, and Method

In October 1982, I started my first job in technology — selling boxes of Elephant Brand DS/DD 5.25" diskettes at The Software Store on Fowler Ave in Tampa, FL. A 10-pack ran $19.95. Each disk held 360KB. Do the math and that's $5,541.67 per gigabyte.

Since the mid-2000s, I've done a completely non-scientific retail search each fall — Amazon, Google, whatever's on the shelf — to see what a gigabyte costs. This page is the running record.

For years, this was a scrappy one-page spreadsheet screenshot. This year, with AI-assisted research pulling from old catalogs, price-history tools, and archived ads, the dataset got a real upgrade: 221 individual price records across 87 different storage media formats, spanning 49 distinct years reaching back to 1977.

Prices are retail snapshots from a non-scientific search each fall. Full sourcing and the complete year-by-year dataset back to 1977 are public on GitHub: github.com/askmcconnell/costofagig


This Year's Headline (2026)

For the first time in this dataset's history, storage got more expensive almost across the board.

Of the 19 items priced so far this year: 13 rose year-over-year (most by 60% to nearly 300%); 2 dropped (32TB bare HDD down 40%, 8TB CineMag down 35%); and 3 held flat.

The bookend stat: the 1977 Radio Shack C-60 cassette tape—like I used for data storage on my first computer, a Commodore PET—cost $9,034/GB. The same cassette, bought on Amazon today, costs $32,073.86/GB — up 255% from where this tradition started.


The Comeback: Optical Media Returns

This year fills a long-standing gap: rewritable optical media hadn't been tracked here since 2018. Three Verbatim formats — CD-RW, DVD+RW, and BD-R — now have their own multi-year Keepa price histories. Two more legacy formats join them: Iomega Jaz and Zip disks, long discontinued but still sold as new-old-stock on Amazon.


Interactive Chart

Log scale — each gridline is 10x the price of the one below it. Source data: github.com/askmcconnell/costofagig

Log-scale chart of the cheapest available storage each year, plotted against formats that never really got cheaper and are tracked as fixed reference lines: the DS/DD floppy (1982 baseline), the C-60 cassette (1977 bookend), and the three rewritable optical formats (CD-RW, DVD+RW, BD-R).


Physical Scale — 1 Gigabyte, Then and Now

Bar heights are log-scaled for visibility, not literal — a true-scale microSD bar would be a fraction of a pixel next to the cassette tower. Each stack holds 1 gigabyte in that format's media.

FormatUnits for 1GBStack height
C-60 Cassette (1977)5,682~237 feet
DS/DD Floppy (1982)2,777~30 feet
microSD (2025+)1Size of a fingernail

The Full 2026 Pricing Table

Media$/GBYoY
32TB Bare HDD (Seagate)$0.0362−40%
30TB Portable HDD (Glyph)$0.0666+163%
BD-R 50GB (Verbatim)$0.08+9%
1TB Thumb Drive (Generic)$0.10+61%
1TB Thumb Drive (Name)$0.15+97%
DVD+RW (Verbatim)$0.1651+20%
2TB microSD (Lexar)$0.1766+108%
512GB microSD$0.2324+297%
2TB SD Card (SanDisk)$0.275new
30TB Portable SSD (Glyph)$0.36+140%
CFExpress Type B 4TB$0.3985+77%
122.88TB SSD (Samsung)$0.4639+277%
CD-RW 700MB (Verbatim)$1.85570%
8TB CineMag 5e$4.0017−35%
Iomega Zip 750MB$13.32890%
Iomega Jaz 1GB$24.99+4%
Iomega Zip 250MB$42.305+21%
DS/DD Floppy$6,928.61−0.03%
C-60 Cassette (Qty 2)$32,073.86+33%

The Shrinking Gigabyte

Icon sizes are stylistic, not to scale. microSD/SSD figures assume storage density is roughly uniform through the device's thickness — a simplification, not a literal cross-section measurement.

MediaYear1 GB SizeScale
C-60 Cassette197772,238 mm (237 ft)~20-story building
DS/DD Floppy19829,144 mm (30 ft)~3-story building
microSD20250.0005 mmwavelength of light
Enterprise SSD20260.0000586 mmroughly virus-sized

Same gigabyte, same unit, 49 years apart: 1.23 billion times smaller.


How Long to Move a Gigabyte?

Media/YearInterfaceSpeedTime
C-60 Cassette (1977)Tape50 bytes/sec~231 days
DS/DD Floppy (1982)MFM31.25 KB/s~8 hr 53 min
SCSI-1 (1986)Parallel SCSI5 MB/s~3 min 20 sec
USB 2.0 (2000)USB~35 MB/s~28.6 sec
SATA I (2003)Serial ATA150 MB/s~6.7 sec
CFExpress (2026)PCIe 3.0~1,700 MB/s~0.59 sec
Portable SSD (2026)Thunderbolt 3~2,800 MB/s~0.36 sec
Enterprise SSD (2026)PCIe 5.07,500 MB/s~0.13 sec

From 1977 cassette to 2026 enterprise SSD: 150 million times faster — a 231-day transfer collapsed into 0.13 seconds.

But wait—there's more. That 231-day cassette time doesn't account for the human cost of physical media manipulation. To store 1GB on C-60 cassettes, you'd need to:

Open cassette case → Remove cassette → Insert into recorder → Close door → Record → Open door → Remove cassette → Peel off label → Write label → Re-insert into case.

Repeat 5,682 times.

Estimate ~45 seconds per cassette (accounting for label writing). That's 71 hours of wrist-destroying, repetitive labor — or about 9 full workdays of non-stop cassette swapping before your fingers start asking why you didn't just buy a microSD card.

Add the 231 days of actual transfer time, and storing 1GB on 1977 cassettes = 231 days + 71 hours of human pain. Your wrist didn't stand a chance.


One Last Thing: The First Hard Drive

IBM 350 RAMAC disk storage unit being restored at the Computer History Museum

IBM 350 RAMAC (1956) — 3.75MB, ~2,000 lbs, being restored at the Computer History Museum.
Photo: vnunet.com, CC BY-SA 2.5, via Wikimedia Commons.

A microSDXC memory card held between two fingers

A 2026-era 2TB microSD card — 533,000× the RAMAC's capacity, weighing about a quarter of a gram.
Photo: Bautsch, CC0, via Wikimedia Commons.

The IBM 350 RAMAC (1956): 3.75MB, weighed 1,730–2,200 lbs, about the size of two refrigerators. A 2026 2TB microSD card holds 533,333× more data and weighs 3.6 million times less.


With Thanks

Sam Watson and Don Watson gave me my first job in technology at The Software Store in Tampa in 1982. Thanks also to Keepa, the magazine and catalog archive sites, and the Anthropic Claude team for the research and page-building work behind this year's edition.